Sign Up
Welcome home! Here at WTMX you can make new friends and meet people with the same interests as you. All free and ad-free.

>
> Lies, Legends, Myths and Fairy tales of the Jewish storyteller -
> The stories in which we drown.
>
> The other day, as I again patiently typed yet another explanation of how Jesus was a Jew, how his story has been twisted into an epic Jewish myth to be accepted without question, I became overwhelmed.
>
> At that moment, I was overcome by how many times I have written these same thoughts in an effort to bring some form of truthful reality to these myths. Again and again, the same fetid thoughts ferment down into our culture as if leaking from a moldering cask of Verboseillado walled up in a Jewish cellar.
>
> https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/bd/7c/05...
>
> All at once, the full spectrum of Jewish lies overwhelmed my consciousness; I had this feeling that everything is connected. Suddenly I could see the whole thing. It was as if a perfect pattern was laid out in front of me. All the lies, all the myths that shape our lives, our history, our very world - I realized we’re all part of it and we’re all trapped by it.
>
> It’s dizzying how these lies legends, myths and fairy tales permeate one’s consciousness. They are embedded, hardwired into our culture at the expense of, not only our own ideas, but truth itself. The illusions have become pervasive to the point most people can no longer perceive even those truths they personally observe.
>
> Thus, there are those who believe the Bible, but don’t believe the Holocaust and vice versa. There are those who reject the Gospels, yet believe rag-tag terrorists brought America low using boxcutters and jet airplanes they could not possibly control. There are those that accept the official version that buildings collapse perfectly into their own footprint from low intensity fires, but refuse to accept the existence of nuclear weapons. Here are a few thoughts for those buying into the storytellers’ recently hatched revision that “nukes” don’t exist, http://www.big-lies.org/jews/articles-on-jews.html #nuke-exit-strategy.
>
> There are those who believe demonic Nhadzees* planned the extermination of the Jewish race. There are those who believe that Masons secretly run the world and that alien grays are warring for planet earth under an airport in Denver . There are those who believe the Bible was literally written by god and that earth is actually the center of the universe. There are those who believe man has been to the moon and those who don’t. There are those who believe Jesus actually raised the dead and will soon return to personally deliver them from their ultimate, hellish fate while others believe he was just the myth of Caesar.
>
> There are those who believe in communism and those who believe in capitalism; those who believe in socialism and those who believe in “representative” democracy. There are those who believe Hitler was a Jew, while others believe Jesus was not. There are those who believe one group of Jewish storytellers claiming Jesus was sent to save the world, while another group of Jewish storytellers emphatically claim he was nothing more than the bastard son of a Roman soldier. But what’s the difference when both versions emanate from a race of people incapable of telling the truth? Then there are those consumed simply by lust for pornography, sports or military adventurism.
>
> One thing is certain, no matter what version one might choose to believe or disbelieve, no matter what vice one wants to sink into and no matter how low, their descent undoubtedly began with some form of myth or delusion written by a Jewish storyteller. In every case, our world has been turned upside down by these storytellers whose words cleanly slice away western culture like razor-sharp knives. Ours is the death of a thousand cuts.
>
> The very foundations of our political, religious and economic beliefs are based on Jewish lies, legends, myths, and fairy tales. We swim through life submerged in a world of Jewish delusion. Like fish that cannot recognize the water surrounding them, we cannot recognize the sea of lies surrounding us. Whether it is an ancient scribe or an academic authority, whether crumbling religious text from the past or tomorrow’s newspaper, whether a comic book or national bestseller, a Hollywood movie, the nightly news or an NPR story, our world has been, and continues to be, profoundly shaped to our detriment by the Jewish storyteller.
>
> From the Bible, to the Holocaust, to the trade towers, reality is based on little more than verbal illusions created by a tiny group of dystopic psychopaths, like those tiny aliens in the Star Trek episode, Cat’s Paw. (This episode presents one of those “They Live” experiences that paints the true Jew)
>
>
>
> The storytellers have turned villains into heroes and heroes into villains. While the founding fathers and other great white men of western civilization have been, at best, relegated to the dust bin and at worst, objects of scorn and ridicule; the lowest form of society’s scum have been elevated to heights of honor.
>
> Look who is admired and venerated today: Actors, once a class of people one wouldn’t want their daughter to marry, are now the focus of social glitter and adulation. Actors are a class we now admire from afar. Negroes and other third worlders, once considered savages to be guided and elevated from their primitive states, are now considered far more advanced in social skills and venerated for their sagely insight and great wisdom – too bad they never had enough wisdom and insight to invent the wheel.
>
> Sports figures, once a gaggle of kids relegated to sand lots after school, are now multi-million dollar super stars barely literate enough to do commercials. Organized crime figures, once tracked down and exterminated like vermin, are now viewed as pillars, albeit lower ones, of society who just happen to be in that line of “work.”
>
> Spies, once shot on site as traitors and considered somewhere on the cultural level of a schoolyard flasher, are now considered coolest of the cool. Corrupt businessmen, indulging in criminal activities to advance their business, are now considered smart and savvy to be doing whatever it takes to get ahead. Politicians, once routinely tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail, now openly spew their vindictive hatred upon the very people who run to the polls to elect them before turning around to give half-million dollar talks to special interest groups.
>
> The fact is the entire bedrock of western culture has been plowed under and sown with foul seeds of vice and corruption. Those who produce the least make the most and those who produce at all are relocated offshore. It’s the era of the Jewish “Luftmench.” These are the men of no inward substance, “airmen” who, like ghouls, haunt the middle of every deal, doing nothing but sucking out their pints of profit. The greatest amount of profit today is created from the suffering of others.
>
>
>
> Whether it’s doctors dispensing pills and exotic cures for dread diseases or lawyers running their mouths to create a more “fair and just society,” or religious hucksters touting their version of “god’s salvation,” there’s big bucks in pain and torment. Of course, one can always bet against themselves with an insurance policy. But did you know the insurance companies run the medical profession; and the storytellers run them both? The fact is the people who make the most money are the people who run their mouths best, and wouldn’t you know it, that just happens to be the storyteller’s forte.
>
>
>
> The question, dangling over our heads like a demented Star of Damocles, is why so many non-Jews want so desperately to join Jews in their delusions. Why do we want so desperately to believe the Jews’ world of lies and illusion? Jews are a race of neurotic, psychotic, murderously psychopathic, pathological liars hell-bent on our destruction. Why then do we strive so mightily to share their mental illness? What is it about the Jewish storyteller that draws us to our own destruction like moths to a flame?
>
> American culture has long had its own myths and fairy tales, like Paul Bunyan and his blue ox Babe, Pecos Bill, (does anyone remember these American folklore characters?) Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy. The difference is that, while the vast majority quit believing these childhood stories at a young age, the myths, lies and fairy tales spun by Jewish storytellers have become cemented into the consciousness as fact.
>
>
>
> One of the defining features of the Jewish fairytale is the total lack of evidence for the story. Those performing hard research on Jewish “historical” accounts quickly discover a complete lack of supporting evidence for the claims being made.
>
> Jewish claims for the Bible, the Holocaust, the attack on the Trade Towers, all suffer from a complete lack of documented hard evidence, along with a plethora of impossible, miraculous details like the parting of a sea, raising the dead, thousands gassed per hour for years on end and large jets either passing though a building intact or being totally vaporized on impact.
>
> Perhaps the most telling detail of a current storyteller’s myth is found in the crucial evidence presented by bandanas and passports that survive an aerial holocaust completely intact. “Oy Vey! A miracle itz!”, cries the Jewish storyteller and the goyim herds, mouths agape, nod stupidly in agreement, never realizing the Jews’ consuming penchant for weaving such unbelievable lies into cultural myths that soon become historical fact.
>
> From Abram and Joseph’s extortion of Pharaoh, to geysers of blood spurting up from the ground; from Nhadzee brain bashing machines and multicolored smoke curling cruelly from bodies, to airplane crashes without bodies, impossible cell phone calls and building seven, what is lacking in all these Jewish fairy tales is any hard evidence anywhere, either now or then.
>
>
>
> Take the Bible for example (you knew I would didn’t you?) The Bible is the paramount example of Jewish myths and legends. There is little, if any, factual evidence for any of the Torah stories outside the Bible. Yet countless hours have been spent attempting to validate these myths as historical fact. Here’s one fact goy Christians invariably fail to notice, the very word “Torah” means both “law” and “instruction.”
>
> According to its title, the Torah consists of books of legal instruction describing obviously metaphorical, legal precedence that support a sacrificial system; this as opposed to a book of factual, historic events. The very name of the book describes its contents, yet it is invariably accepted as an historical account of not just Judaism, but the world! Were that the case, one would think the authors would have titled it something like “Historia Planeta” or “Istoró̱ Planítis.”
>
>
>
> What is the rational person to think about stories like the creation of Adam, who begins life as a little mud doll formed by a parental god, in his own image no less, into which he breaths life? Considering the scale of the universe, one might think the image of god to be somewhat grander than an infinitesimally small, bipedal parasite foraging on a moldy, mustard-seed molecule of a solar system in a tiny, far away, forgotten galaxy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoW8Tf7hTGA
>
> Is it possible the storytellers made up their creation story? Me thinks they didn’t have a clue about how the world works.
>
>
>
> What about the Tower of Babel, Cain and Able, The sacrifice of Isaac, Abram the extortionist, Jacob the conniving thief and liar, Sodom and Gomorrah, The walls of Jericho? The key to understanding just how pervasive Jewish thought has become in this culture can be uncovered in the question, “How many of these stories do you know by heart versus other accounts of non-Jewish religious figures? How many Egyptian or Greek Gods can you name; how many of their stories can your recite by heart?” Perhaps a more crucial question might be; “Are any of these ancient gods linked to your modern day religious or cultural beliefs?”
>
>
>
> While such non-Jewish characters are now relegated to a place high on a dusty shelf, tucked far away in the back of some forgotten museum, thanks to the talents of the Jewish storyteller, the Bible is considered more relevant today then when it was written some three millennia ago.
>
> But then, what of Darwin’s theory of evolution, a story the storytellers have now embraced, expanded, stretched and twisted until it has replaced their own god as the traditional, factual, account of man’s creation? Was it a monkey or God that created man? This has become our divisive choice. How’s that again? Oh yeah, “Jews set ‘em up and the Jews knock ‘em down.”
>
>
>
> The Bible’s flood account is an obvious plagiarism of the Story of Gilgamesh, written some five hundred years earlier. Many who have read the Gilgamesh account, clearly finds this to be the case. What’s more, plagiarism, forgery and theft of ideas, objects and words, are respected cultural traits of the Jewish “Luftmench.”
>
> Due to misinterpretation of the story, everyone assumes Noah’s Ark is a boat or ship-shaped vessel, yet the story says “ ARK ”, not “boat” or “ship.” The only other ark mentioned in the Bible is the Ark of the Covenant, another mysteriously mythical object invented by Jews, and one that clearly has no relation to water.
>
> Boats and ships are mentioned elsewhere in the Old Testament, so Jewish storytellers were clearly aware of such vessels. Why then is Noah’s vessel described as an “ark” and not a “boat” or “ship?” What do these two mysterious vessels have in common? According to the storytellers, these are where god’s most sacred objects are stored.
>
>
>
> Noah’s ark contained seven of each of the acceptable sacrificial animals, along with God’s other lesser creations. These animals were closest to god’s (and the sacrificial priesthood’s) heart, while the Ark of the Covenant ostensibly held the remnants of God’s commandments. Any rational individual studying the Jews will have strong suspicions the Ark of the Covenant contained something far more valuable than crumbling bits of sticks and stones and a rancid pot of Manna. Unlike Noah’s ark, this ark in all probability did exist.
>
>
>
> Most everyone knows the Exodus fable. The traditional Sunday school version is the Egyptians enslaved the “Israelites” forcing them to work in the “slime pits” building bricks for the pyramids until a savior named Moses delivers God’s chosen people from their bondage. That’s how the storytellers’ movies portray the events. Yet, the slightest examination of this “children’s story,” as one rabbi put it, reveals so many holes as to beggar the slightest credibility.
>
> First, unlike Jews, Egyptians did little in the way of practicing or promoting slavery. As a hard working, productive, self-sustaining culture, they had little need or use for slaves. By contrast, Jews were the consummate slavers of the ancient world, (and still are today) which is undoubtedly why the Bible story reads as it does. Second, the “Israelites” were a thousand years in the future when the pyramids were constructed around 2700 BC or perhaps earlier.
>
>
>
> In fact, these massive stone (not adobe) structures, one of the seven wonders of the ancient world, leads one to wonder if the storytellers ever actually visited Egypt, as these massive structures, the very symbol of ancient Egypt, are never mentioned in the Bible. Yet, there is evidence that an “Exodus” did occur, but in a far different manner then Jewish storytellers would have us believe.
> Various ancient Egyptian texts provide unmistakable evidence the original Jews were referred to by ancient Egyptians as “Hyksos.” The key to their true identity lies in the descriptions of these people. As Jesus said, “Ye shall know them by their fruits” and this story would be hard pressed to get any fruitier.
> No one knows where the Hyksos came from, they just showed up and, major clue number one: wormed their way into the Nile ’s delta region to divide the nation, splitting the kingdom in half. Since then, the divide-and-conquer story of The Tower of Babel, has been the story tellers’ model for the destruction of host cultures.
> Major clue number two: Egyptians referred to the Hyksos as “shepherd kings.” So how many times did we hear the “Israelites as shepherds” theme in Sunday school? In fact the lamb was the Temple ’s primary sacrificial animal, as in “Paschal lamb.”
>
> Jesus as Shepherd
> Major clue number three: Rabbinical Judaism calculates Moses’ lifespan as corresponding to the years 1391–1271 BC; Jerome speculates 1592 BC to be his birthdate, while James Ussher considers 1571 BC as his birth year. The Hyksos settled in the eastern Nile Delta, some time before 1650 BC. Seqenenre Tao, Kamose and Ahmose waged war against the Hyksos, expelling them from Egypt around 1550 BC. This is a rare and unusual example where the storyteller’s Biblical myth timeline is relatively aligned with what are thought to be unrelated historical records and timelines.
> Major clue number four: Around 300 BC, the Egyptian historian Manetho wrote how the Egyptians had to cut a deal with the Hyksos to get them to leave their lush, garden paradise. After the Egyptians made their payoff, some 240,000 Hyksos left Egypt to make a beeline for Israel , w leaving the Nile Delta, traveling east, where they founded a city called, and here’s the six-million dollar clue - Jerusalem!
> Slice this with Occam’s razor:
> “Tethmosis, son of Alisphragmuthosis, attempted to take the city by force and by siege with four hundred and eighty thousand men surrounding it. But he despaired of taking the place by siege, and concluded a treaty with them, that they should leave Egypt , and go, without any harm coming to them, wherever they wished. After the conclusion of the treaty they left with their families and chattels, not fewer than two hundred and forty thousand people, and crossed the desert into Syria . Fearing the Assyrians, who dominated over Asia at that time, they built a city in the country which we now call Judea . It was large enough to contain this great number of men and was called - Jerusalem.” - Manetho.
> How many more smoking Jews are required for proof?
>
> Those reading this may have read my previous account of how the interlocked triangles comprising the Star of David symbolize what Jews consider their first successful inversion and destruction of an advanced culture. Note the following, “The symbol (SoD) became representative of the worldwide Zionist community after it was chosen as the central symbol on a flag at the First Zionist Congress in 1897, due to its wide recognition and usage in Jewish communities, and its lack of specifically religious connotations.”
> The upright triangle represents the pyramid, classic symbol of ancient Egyptian culture, while the inverted triangle represents Moses inversion of that culture. The interlocking represents how the Hyksos/Jews intertwined themselves with Egyptian culture to a point where the two were inextricably linked. Dr. Jan Assmann refers to this as “normative inversion” and describes the process in his book Moses the Egyptian.
>
> Surely, most are aware of the list of the 109 countries from which Jews have been expelled. Yet none top this list with Egypt . That would make the list stand at 110.
> Let’s review. The Hyksos worm their way into Egypt and take over half the kingdom though subversion. They then divide the nation and its people. They are a pernicious people that for generations, irritate the Egyptians to no end. Finally an Egyptian king successfully mounts a military campaign, but the Hyksos flee to their capital city of “Avaris,” where they barricade themselves in. (No joke, the name of the Hyksos’ capital is Avaris, how’s that for poetic irony?) When the Egyptians find they cannot dislodge the Hyksos from Avaris, they send in an emissary to buy them off. Doesn’t this sound like the standard Jewish theme for host cultures played out some 109 times across history? Can we accurately identify these ancient Hyksos by their rotten “fruits”?
> Let us now return to the Biblical version for a moment with a verse from Exodus “But every woman shall borrow of her neighbour, and of her that sojourneth in her house, jewels of silver, and jewels of gold, and raiment: and ye shall put them upon your sons, and upon your daughters; and ye shall spoil the Egyptians.”
> “Borrow” gold, silver and jewels? Spoil the Egyptians? Sounds like the same payoff as the Egyptian version of the Hyksos doesn’t it? The story of the Hyksos has “Jew” written all over it, yet the storytellers emphatically deny any connection to these people, as doing so might reveal them as something other than poor oppressed, victims, enslaved by an evil race of anti-Semites. Here is a more in depth explanation of the Hyksos http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/hyksos.htm
> Jews obviously feel the heat from the truth of this ancient historical account as they can be found busily gnawing away in the effort to distance themselves from the Hyksos narrative. The word “shepherd” hits spot on, as this is how ancient Jews are described in the Genesis story of Joseph. The title “king” is simply over the top for Jews, as this elevates the Biblical Jew from the lowly, oppressed slave class, to a lofty position of top-level leadership, over other cultures no less! The storytellers have already begun trying to subtly remold the original account, sowing confusion to cloud their identity and culpability with claims like, “the Greek term, “Hyksos” has been incorrectly translated as ‘shepherd-kings.’”
> But just in case they wind up taking the blame, another emerging popular theme is all the “good” things the Hyksos’ “Tikkun Olam,” brought to the peaceful Egyptians. Marvelous new inventions to kill enemies, e.g. horses, chariots, the composite bow, improved battle axes, advanced fortification techniques and nuclear weapons. (Scratch that last example, nuclear weapons were the “improvement” storytellers recently brought to western civilization.) In any event, the storytellers never fail to cover all the bases, whether good, bad or indifferent.
>
> A comparable modern storyteller myth is that Ashkenazi Jews are not related to Biblical Jews. Unsurprisingly, this new myth was founded by Arthur Koestler, a card-carrying member of the storyteller’s guild. Yet, when one examines the evidence, what are the chances of a totally unrelated culture, thousands of years after the fact, assuming the exact same racial characteristics as an ancient people? Here’s a challenge, name one other example of this miraculous transmutation of cultural identity. Oy Vey! Another miracle it’z! But why is it only Jews are subject to such miracles? No doubt it’z because they are God’s chosen people.
> All the way back to the Jews’ nursery school days of the Israelites, Ashkenazi Jews mirror the same exact same racial traits as their ancient tribal brethren in much the same manner as those ganged, puppet dancers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nIx-6irf8o. Then again, does it even matter when modern Ashkenazi Jews are destroying western culture in virtually the same manner as their ancient ancestors destroyed Egypt ? Why this absurd attempt by the storytellers to distance themselves from their ancient ancestors?
> What is to be gained by this new deception? Once again, it clouds and obfuscates observable reality. Like those alien grays and evil Nhadzees taking over the planet from their arctic bases, the myth of the “thirteenth tribe” misdirects a certain segment of the public, putting them at odds with those who have learned otherwise.
> In this instance, known reality is that, from the Exodus to the Holocaust, it’s all Jewish “history.” The storyteller’s myth is designed to divide and conquer by confusion. As more and more people awaken to the storytellers’ lies, they are beginning to examine the Biblical horror stories in a much different light. Since there is no denying the horrors of the Bible, the next best thing is to deny any connection to them.
> So the question put forth by the storytellers is not, “Are Jews a unified race to be held accountable for their historical crimes?” but one of fractured identity of the Ashkenazi. If they are not Jews, then what are they? With this new version, think about how much Jewish history can be questioned, if not denied. If the Ashkenazi are not be related to the biblical Jews, then they certainly cannot be the people held responsible for murdering Jesus - can they?
> Everywhere one looks, they find the storytellers continually altering history, changing reality; endlessly dizzying the gullible goyim with the admonishment: Look over here! No! Look over there! No! No! It’s over here! No, it’s over there! You’re wrong, look again, it’s really not here at all! Round and round and round we go, where and when we fall, no one knows.
>
> Let’s take another look at what Eric Blair said about this penchant for historical revisionism – “Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.” Obviously, the storytellers control the present, that is why white Americans had a third-world, Negro despot for president. So then, if the storytellers are not attempting to control the past, why are they constantly making these historical revisions?
> The Hyksos left paradise with a large payoff of gold and silver, obviously in need of a secure way to transport all their booty, east to Jerusalem . This brings us to the Ark of the Covenant. Rumor has it the Ark of the Covenant was supposed to carry “God’s commandments.” It’s construction allegedly followed a design pattern given to Moses by God, while the Israelites were encamped at the foot of Mount Sinai - but not the one known today.
> This was party time for the newly freed “Israelites,” who could now ride the bus unmolested, but instead of breaking out the good stuff and having a pole dancer entertain them, they decide to spend a bit of time fashioning a golden calf so they could bow down and worship it. My how times have changed – haven’t they?
>
> Of course in the storyteller’s usual maudlin, aggrandizing way of claiming great and ever so ‘umble fealty to their Lord God, YHVH, this grand box of bling supposedly served as a receptacle for the two smashed tablets of the Decalogue, a pot of manna and Aaron’s rod. But why would these Israelites keep the remnants of the first Decalogue after god rewrote it?
>
> “Deuteronomy 5:4–25 consists of God's re-telling of the Ten Commandments to the younger generation who were to enter the Promised Land. The passages in Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 5 contain more than ten imperative statements, totaling 14 or 15 in all.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Commandments
>
> And what happened to the payoff - all that gold the Jew/Hyksos “borrowed” from the Egyptians as they departed into the desert to make a beeline for "Jezreel", a city of "wearers of the sidelock."
>
> The Book of Exodus gives detailed instructions on how the Ark was to be constructed. ‘It is to be gilded entirely with gold, and a crown of gold is to be put around it. Four rings of gold are to be attached to its four corners, two on each side—and through these rings staves of shittim-wood overlaid with gold for carrying the Ark are to be inserted; and these are not to be removed. A golden lid is to be covered with two (count ‘em, two!) golden cherubim, and placed above the Ark. ’”
>
>
>
> “Shittim-wood” It’z zo Chooish! Let’s see now, gold, gold, gold, gold, gold, and golden, all to house those most precious family heirlooms, sticks, stones and a pot of rancid manna. Hard to believe Jews were ever this sentimental – really – hard – to - believe.
>
> So this Ark supposedly served as a receptacle for the two stone tablets of the Decalogue, a pot of stinking, gooey manna and Aaron’s rod. But what happened to all that gold and silver Jews “borrowed” from the Egyptians as they skedaddled out of paradise for a place called Jerusalem ? What happened to the golden calf that so greatly urinated Moses? Are we to believe that, of all people, JEWS!!! would be expected to leave that golden treasure behind in the desert?
>
>
>
> Wait a minute, what if they builded a flashy, sacred box in which to store the gold? And heck, while they’re at it, why not smear some bling on the outside just to make sure everyone knows it’z kosher?
>
> Here is yet another clue about this box. Rumor again has it that the army that carries the Ark before it is assured of victory. So what might this mysterious power be that assures military victory? Come on now, is it really that difficult to understand what power has always driven armies to victory, with or without a box of bling marching at their fore?
>
> Why not look at the America ’s “defense” spending for a clue? And remember how the Soviets drove themselves under financially trying to keep up with America ’s military spending? I’ll bet they could have used the chosen one’s sacred box of bling marching in front of their army - ya think?
>
> Weigh the evidence carefully. Considering the Jews’ historical attitude towards gold, which objects are Jews more likely to lug across a vast expanse of hot, dry, desert for forty years; sticks, stones and putrid manna or a golden calf-in-the-box? I can almost hear the Israelites whining to Moses: “Sticks and stones will break our bones, but gold will make us wealthy.” This is also why, when Pompey got there, the cupboard was bare. No doubt a little Jewish bird flew to the kohein gadol’s (high priest’s) ear to let him know beforehand the goyim are coming! Big Duh! there.
>
> Given its actual contents, is it any wonder that anyone encountering the ark suffers:
> 0 instant death, or worse,
> 0 becomes smitten with hemorrhoids or plagues of mice?
> (Check the box of your preference)
>
> Hemorrhoids and plagues of mice, isn’t it just special how these bizarre retributions are what storytellers mete out to the Philistines after they capture the storyteller’s sacred box of bling? Considering the source, I can understand hemorrhoids, after all we’re talking scatological Jews here, but plagues of mice? Hey guys! I think it’z time to go back to the scripting room for some revisions. Common now, Freddy Kruger? Jason? Pinhead? Hannibal Lecter? Surely you can do better than mice and hemorrhoids.
>
> Next we quote Peter Leithart who writes: “The ark brings about plagues, humbles the gods of the Philistines and returns full of treasure.” Full – of – Treasure! How much more obvious can it get? The Ark is all about go(l)d! That’s G-O-D spelled with an “L”.
>
> However, (I’ve saved the best for last), in order to end their plagues, Philistine diviners advise the people to make “a guilt offering of five gold mice and five golden tumors.” (Remember this is the storyteller’s version as opposed to the Philistinian version story) Thus, in this description, we find one of those peculiar traits of the chosen ones where they point to a symbolic representation of what they really are and what they represent to the Philistines, i.e. a race of vermin bringing virulent plagues to their host culture. And there’s that lust for gold again.
>
>
>
> How many people have gone in search of these Arks? How many have claimed to have actually discovered Noah’s mythical ark? And what did these intrepid vindicators of Bible lore discover when they went in search of that ark? What else - the very large boat they expected to find. I’m thinking that, in the fevered mind of the storyteller, Noah’s ark was just an enlarged version of that other box of bling.
>
> These are but small examples of the storyteller’s talent from their Old Testament, Now let’s examine the storyteller’s New Testament. Here is a Jewish story with a proven historical basis. Jesus, the story’s main character, has been mentioned by recognized historical figures outside the Bible. Yet, this story has once again been turned upside down and mythologized by Jews into another one of their highly imaginative fairy tales both for and against Jesus.
>
>
>
> Incredibly, current popular thinking has it that the entire Gospel story is a myth. Jesus never actually existed; he was at best, nothing more than an amalgamation of other historical characters. So we are supposed to believe Jews have maintained a virulent hatred for a mythical character that was nothing more than a figment of goyim imagination, an amalgamation of various other characters?
>
> Hate the story, perhaps; but two thousand years of Jewish hatred for the man who never was?! http://www.thefilmyap.com/movies/the-man-who-never... What are the chances, what – are - the – chances of Jews being this gullible? And here’s a good one, the final line from the linked review reads – “In moviemaking, if not in war, myth always trumps history.” How true.
>
> There is ample historical evidence outside the Bible for the time, location and larger events mentioned in the Gospel narrative, yet naysayers lament if Jesus had performed such profound miracles like raising the dead, why aren’t these mentioned in other historical accounts? Perhaps it’s because these “miracles” are actually down-to-earth acts of legal insurrection that produced “unintended outcomes” to Jewish temple law. Laws that were of no consequence or interest to others in that time and place. Wouldn’t that make sense? Wouldn’t that concept fit perfectly in the world we all know and live in?
>
>
>
> How much religious minutiae, of great interest to its followers, pass unnoticed by the much larger population of non-believers? Vatican II had a huge impact on Catholics, yet how many other Christian sects, never mind the secular masses, felt profoundly affected by the Catholic church’s seismic shift in dogma? How many politically focused pundits stopped to expound upon Vatican II? Where is Vatican II in our history books, outside of perhaps a footnote? How many can name the pope(s)-in-charge during Vatican II?
>
> By this example, one can clearly see why the Romans and others would have taken no interest in what to them was just another Jewish, religious insurrectionist. To first century Romans, Jesus was a completely insignificant character.
>
> Of course, when Jewish storytellers wove the story into another fabulous mystical religious myth of miraculous intrigue, the once minor historical figure assumed monumental proportions on a scale that would from that point forward, lead to unimaginable death and destruction across the face of the planet.
>
> From Constantine on, many warring armies would march across history carrying shields emblazoned with the sign of the cross while singing Onward Christian Soldiers.
>
>
>
> Thus, within the Gospels, one finds an actual historical account for which there is at least tenuous evidence. So what happens to this mundane account of a religious insurrection? Jews turn it into yet another monstrous myth! Here we find the Jewish storytellers turning reality into myth in much the same manner as they turn myth into reality.
>
> A final note on Jesus. From my own study, I find Jesus to be an enlightened sage and great teacher. A sage who presented the same truths to first century Jews that Buddah had introduced to Asians further east some 500 years earlier. However, Jesus was a Jew who had come first and foremost, to address Jewish religious issues concerning their corrupt Temple ’s bloody sacrificial system that was physically and spiritually impoverishing Temple followers. Jesus spoke clearly on this matter, commanding his disciples to stay the hell away form gentiles.
>
> These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel . - Matthew 10
>
> Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon . And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel .
>
> “Lost sheep of Israel ” literally translates to “first century Jewish followers of the ‘second’ Temple .”
>
> While Jesus’ message contains timeless elements of truth that have echoed across the ages from all great teachers and sages, it was specifically tailored for Jews of the first century. His mission was never intended to be carried beyond that time and place. It was the storytellers that carried it forward to serve their own greedy purposes.
>
> That it why the name “Jesus,” along with his message, became a twisted, misshapened travesty of hate and vengeance that led to countless deaths and massive destruction for two thousand years and continues to this day. Jesus would have been appalled. Had he seen the future outcome of his regional efforts there can be no doubt he would never have uttered a single word.
>
>
>
>
> Now for a final, telling example of the storyteller’s “chutzpa” in changing history - The Thracians
> Thracian graves and tombstones often have the name Rufus, meaning “redhead”, inscribed on them, – a common name given to Thracians. Ancient Greek artworks often depict Thracians as redheads. Rhesus of Thrace , a mythological Thracian King, is so named because of his red hair and is depicted on Greek pottery as having red hair and beard. Ancient Greek writers also described the Thracians as having red hair. A fragment by the Greek poet Xenophanes describes the Thracians as blue-eyed and red haired:
> “...Men make gods in their own image; those of the Ethiopians are black and snub-nosed, those of the Thracians have blue eyes and red hair.”
> Bacchylides described Theseus as wearing a hat with red hair, which classicists believe was Thracian in origin. Other ancient writers who described the hair of the Thracians as red include Hecataeus of Miletus, Galen, Clement of Alexandria, and Julius Firmicus Maternus.
> Do you think Thracians might have had red hair? Would you feel the evidence provided by ancient references made by people who were there, might make that a pretty fair certainty of it?
> Nevertheless . . . ‘According to Dr. Beth Cohen, Thracians had "the same dark hair and facial features as the Ancient Greeks."’ So are we to accept the idea those ancient references are wrong, debunked by a single Jewish doctor of god-knows-what?
> Question: Given the preponderance of evidence to the contrary, what might her rational be for such a contradictory statement? Could it be another small cut by the storytellers to obliterate the special physical features of the white race?
> Remember how the name “Hyksos,” originally translated as “shepherd kings”, is now claimed to be a mistranslation? That was another small cut to change history. The storytellers never rest in their effort to redefine and obscure every jot and tittle of historical truth, replacing it with fevered fantasy.
> Why then do we want so desperately to believe in these myths created by Jews? What is it that drives us to believe those pretty Jewish lies using words like: “democracy,” “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” or “liberty, equality, fraternity” or “diversity is our strength” when personal observation has revealed time and again, these lofty platitudes actually bring about the very opposite of their meaning?
>
> Why is it we largely ignore the million of lives lost in two fratricidal, global wars? Why is it we scrupulously avoid any mention of the Judeocommunist’s murder of sixty-six million people, their grisly Holodomor genocide by starvation, the even larger atrocities of Mao and his communist regime, the Allies’ intentional slaughter of a million and a half German POWs, the Katyn forest massacre, the genocide of the Palestinians and countless other, well documented, atrocities?
>
> How is it we turn a blind eye to these well documented historic horrors, rushing blithely past to embrace hideous, pornographic mythical holocaust scenes of an impossible number of victims only a viciously crazed Jewish scriptwriter could invent? Why do we embrace impossible portrayals of vicarious mythical suffering, ranging from countless movies and TV shows to museums and memorials we pay for, while ignoring the real genocidal massacres of history?
>
>
>
>
> A primary trait of such Jewish myths is the “monolithic” nature of non-Jewish cultures. As Barbra Spectre’s example infamously pointed out, to this day, Jews harbor a great, ancient fear and hatred of “monolithic” or homogeneous cultures. The earliest Biblical story of civilization involves the threat of Nimrod’s racially homogeneous people, to wit: “And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. They are all one people!”
>
> So what does one find in the Jews’ Nhadzee myth? A monolithic nation of hateful demons among whom, as in the myth of Sodom and Gomorrah , there is not one “righteous or just” individual worth saving.
>
>
>
> It is interesting to note traditional Jewish portrayals of Nhadzees* mirror the Jew’s own golem myth as unthinking, robotic, monsters that unquestioningly do the bidding of their mystical master, der Führer. The only difference in these stories is that the golem served the Jews, whereas the Nhadzees* served the Germans – at least until the Jews mythologized and demonized them into greater service to the Jewish cause. Talk about a hive-minded monolithic race; termites have more diversity in their nests than Jews.
>
> According to their claims, Jews were victims of a German genocidal campaign. Yet when they commit a genocidal atrocity against the indigenous Palestinians, they are still victims? Vat!? Why is it so many unquestionably accept Jewish claims of a German genocidal attempt against their entire race, when no hard evidence can be produced and when the very discussion of the subject has been made legally verboten?
>
> Yet, these same slavish followers of the sacred holocaust ignore, justify or even deny the more-than-hard documented cases of the Jews’ genocidal campaign against the Palestinians? It’s Jewish storytellers that accomplish these wonders of disbelief.
>
> Let’s look at just a few Jewish cultural myths. How many can be validated outside the Jewish storytellers’ version?
>
> Passover?
> Masada?
> Esther?
> Joseph?
> Moses?
> The Exodus? (See above)
> The Holocaust?
> Samson?
> Solomon or his temple?
> David?
>
>
>
> Virtually the entire fabric of Jewish culture is woven from the gossamer threads of such myths and legends. Is it any wonder they cannot fathom, let alone sustain, any truth with which they are faced? Jews wouldn’t know the truth if it hit them in the face like a bloody-wet, menstrual rag and they certainly do not enjoy hearing it anywhere nearly as much as that hole in the sheet.
>
> The lies, legends, myths and fairy tales, and those questions arising from them, are simply too large to list. They are so voluminous, so intertwined with our thoughts and what we choose to believe is reality, the vast majority of our people can no longer separate fact from fiction, fantasy from reality. Theirs is a matrix of total confusion. Red pill? Blue pill? Doesn’t matter, it’s all illusion, within an allusion, inside a delusion. The effect is so pervasive, so encompassing, we can no longer stand apart from it or disentangle it from our collective soul.
>
> Was there really a space race to the moon, or were people just being manipulated to reinforce the rapidly waning support for the cold war military spending furthering advanced weapons technology? Remember those wonderful military “gifts” the Hyksos brought to the peaceful Egyptians?
>
> Who most likely had not only the means, but the chutzpa, to murder a sitting American president?
>
> A. A crazed lone gunman who did it for communism?
> B. A two-bit organized crime boss?
> C. The ruler of a third world, Caribbean nation?
> or -
> D. An entire nation of psychopathic thieves, with gigantically disproportionate representation in American government, who felt their financial and nuclear power was being threatened?
>
> Go ahead, take Occam’s machete and thrash away at an answer until you figure it out. Note the common Jewish storytelling technique used here, referred to in legal terms as, “leading the gullible, stupid witnesses to a conclusion.” But then, Jews do so love manipulating the law, almost as much as they love storytelling; after all, it means they can run their mouths.
>
> What might happen if the heavy veil of Jewish lies, legends, myths and fairy tales were suddenly lifted from our minds? What would the world look like without Jewish storytellers spinning their web of delusional myths to veil known reality with fantastic illusion? Would we even be able to cope with the remaining truth? Obviously, Jews don’t think so because a Jewish storyteller, Rob Reiner, has a movie character spew forth the following telling lines:
>
>
>
> Jessup: You want answers?
> Kaffee: I think I'm entitled!
> Jessup: You want answers?!
> Kaffee: I want the truth!
> Jessup: You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg?
>
> This is clearly a Hollywood portrayal of an imagined Jewish belief painted as reality. This is an all too typical, in-your-face-fuck-you-goyim statement being made by a Jewish storyteller. What’s more, this movie was widely acclaimed by its goyim audience.
>
> In this epic scene, one finds a psychopathic character screaming how white men can’t handle the truth. Note the withering attack on Lieutenant Weinberg, a character that has no other place in the scene then to serve as an “anti-Semite’s” whipping boy, just so the audience knows for sure the psychopath “Jessup” isn’t Chooish.
>
> In truth, this scene exhibits a primary Jewish cultural trait, that of projecting the Jewish mentality on a goyim character. It’s not the goyim who are unable to “handle the truth”, it’s the fantasizing Jew that is unable to cope with the truth. For proof of this, just try opening up a debate on the Holocaust.
>
>
> Yet we must face our own truth, is this fictional character plausibly correct in his observation that white men cannot handle the truth? From the evidence presented by the white races’ mindless rush to embrace Jewish lies, legends, myths and fairy tales, this Jewish storyteller is actually stating what the storytellers have long known – we won’t recognize, let alone believe, the truth when they spin their web of lies around our minds.
>
>
>
> These wicked witches and wizards of Wordsmithy mutter foul incantations while crouching over their bubbling cauldrons of verbiage. Their teeth drip red with the blood of Palestinian children as they stir in nasty expletives while croaking, “we think it’s worth it!” Demon Shabbat goy and zombie social warriors grovel at their feet, supplying ever more ingredients that feed a vicious vichyssoise of verbosity.
>
> Eye of guilt, heart of hate, white genocide will be your fate!
> Lump of lies, sweet words and myths, error from tongue of vulture,
> A flask of horror with shot of terror, will wreck the white man’s culture.
> Small twist of humor to top it off, so they won’t know we kill them soft.
>
> We spit in their face, we lie in their ear,
> We smother their world with blankets of fear.
> Holocausts and trade towers to make them flinch,
> We’ve stolen their Christmas with our Grinch.
>
> Monsanto brings fruit from our vines
> With genes we’ve spliced like Frankenstein
> This horror food we sell to you
> Is gobbled down without a clue
>
> Promised health, medical incantation
> It’s a death of stealth by vaccination
> Laced with mercury that is so hot
> These kill and maim like bullets shot
>
> They cannot see with their own eye
> Clear evidence that we deny
> Those trails of death that cross the sky
>
> We drive the Goyim to despair,
> For this, a lie we quote,
> “You have a voice in de-moc-rac-y”,
> “You have the right to vote!”
>
> Stolen houses from widows, Wall Street deals from hell,
> We fatten our coffers with these sweet words: buy! Buy! BUY! No - sell!
>
> Stealing from the goyim is like taking a grizzly bear’s honey,
> Be careful, make sure they’re fast asleep, before you debase their money.
>
> These things from our bag of tricks we play,
> So to the goyim this we say,
> A stake to the heart is our only fear,
> But we’ve stolen your soul, so killing us will cost you dear!
>
> *According to the Babylonian Hebrew Dictionary, the Jewish pejorative “Nhadzee”, Hebrew spelling “Nh_dzi,” but invariably misspelled “Nazi,” is pronounced by highlighting the first syllable “Nhad” with a high pitched, nasally whine, spoken as though one’s entire family line died tragically in the Hallowedhoax. The silent “H” softens the vowel, giving the syllable an “ahhhhh” sound, as if one is moaning from infected hemorrhoids. The syllable should invoke the thought “Nhad again!” The second syllable should be a cry of anguish, like one has been violently struck, even though the speaker might actually be doing the striking. Note, such terms, should always be used in a manner that leaves the listener with an intense hatred for the German people.
>
> - Arch Stanton
Reply Reply All Forward
   likes this.