Sign Up
Welcome home! Here at WTMX you can make new friends and meet people with the same interests as you. All free and ad-free.

by
Americans have the right to travel freely in their cars...
Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221
Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579
Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125
Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941
1890 Swift v. City of Topeka
1889 Indiana Supreme Court, Holland v. Bartch
King v. New Rochelle Housing Authority (1971)
Rumford v. City of Berkeley, 31 Cal. 3d 545, 550 (1982)


The state cannot issue a license or charge a fee for the exercise of that right...
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 US 105


If the state does try to license or charge for the exercise of a right, the people may engage in that right with impunity...
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, AL, 373 US 262
Miller v. US, 230 F 486, at 489
Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F 946


A right cannot be made into a privilege...
Hertado v. California, 110 US 516, U.S Supreme Court
Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60
Article Six of the U.S. Constitution


All laws repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491


A Maxim of Law

Free people have a right to travel on the roads which are provided by their servants for that purpose, using ordinary transportation of the day.

"The streets of a city belong to the people of the state, and every citizen of the state has a right to the use thereof,.... "The use of highways for purposes of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental right, of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived ... [A]ll persons have an equal right to use them for purposes of travel by proper means, and with due regard for the corresponding rights of others..."
--Rumford v. City of Berkeley,
supra, 31 Cal.3d 545, 549-550
and: City of Poway v. City of San Diego (1991)
229 Cal.App.3d 847, 280 Cal.Rptr. 368